**Links to**: [[Semantic attractor]], [[Concept]], [[Invention]], [[Noise]], [[Generativity]], [[Logopatía]], [[Modulations]], [[Language-modulating]], [[Meta-language]], etc. ### [[Postulate]]: The logistics of neologisms is a new kind of logistics _and_ logic, the logic needed for [[Language-modulating]]. New words come into existence as they answer to novelty, this is a fact. While sometimes just as annoying as [[Excessgesis]], _neologistics_ is an important endeavor. How else is the visibility of a new area, discipline, concern, etc. supposed to emerge if not from the category (the concept) that designates it? How else is the diversification of knowledge supposed to happen, if not by the hand of new concepts? How else does language evolve? Change is a matter of fact. In a dream of optimism, we seek novelty in change. Novelty, which we seem to be interested in, is a fundamental aspect of diversity, which we also seem to be interested in. In _The Question Concerning Technology in China_, Yuk Hui addresses the importance of (techno)diversity best: technics—within which we include language and logic—is the literal hand that *shapes, molds, morphs, contorts* “nature.”^[ A necessarily vague—currently rather vintage—concept, one that has been highly ontoepistemically variable across times and regions. The reason for something like multinaturalism (Viveiros de Castro) to emerge as a response to its variability or actual inexistence.] With reduced ways to access reality (e.g., as “nature”), we stubbornly negate change and generate our own suffering (by destroying the conceptual possibility of the future/environment/each other/etc.). Neologistics is needed for dealing with change. It also awakens communitarian motivation to language-modulate, to see language as technics, to engage with the song of speech, to reverse-engineer [[Vantagepointillism]], etc. Deleuze says something in the world _forces_ us to think. Sometimes this is the simple apparition of a an unknown term, always a neologism, and a concept slowly begins to develop around it, as it forces us to think and begins to become its own sense-making entity, if enough dialogical agents engage it. As mentioned, this has happened, in the context of this research, with things like [[Xpectator]], [[12 Negintelligibility]], [[Entropicalia]], [[Vantagepointillism]], and others. Often: first was the word, which the concept(s) grew out of.   ### Footnotes